CSS Grid vs Flexbox: When to Use Each

The Core Difference

The fundamental difference between CSS Grid and Flexbox comes down to dimensionality:

Flexbox: One-Dimensional

Flexbox arranges items in a single direction—either as a row or a column. It excels at distributing space along one axis and aligning items within that axis.

1

2

3

Items flow in one direction →

Grid: Two-Dimensional

Grid arranges items in rows AND columns simultaneously. It's designed for complex layouts where you need precise control over both dimensions.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Items arranged in rows × columns

Quick Decision Framework

✅ Use Flexbox When:

You're arranging items in a single row or column
You need to align items along one axis (center, justify, distribute)
The layout is content-driven (items determine their own size)
You're building navigation menus, toolbars, or button groups
You need items to wrap naturally based on content

✅ Use CSS Grid When:

You're creating a page-level layout with header, footer, sidebar, etc.
You need precise control over rows AND columns
The layout is layout-driven (container determines item placement)
You're building galleries, dashboards, or card grids
You need items to span multiple rows or columns

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Navigation Bar (Flexbox)

A navigation bar is a perfect use case for Flexbox. Items are in a row, you want to control spacing between them, and some items might align left while others align right.

                <nav class="navbar">
  <div class="logo">Brand</div>
  <div class="nav-links">
    <a href="#">Home</a>
    <a href="#">About</a>
    <a href="#">Contact</a>
  </div>
  <button>Login</button>
</nav>

.navbar {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 1rem 2rem;
}

.nav-links {
  display: flex;
  gap: 2rem;
}
            

Brand Logo

Home About Contact

Live Demo: Flexbox Navigation

Example 2: Dashboard Layout (CSS Grid)

A dashboard with header, sidebar, main content, and widgets is perfect for Grid. You need precise control over both rows and columns, and some elements span multiple cells.

                .dashboard {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-areas:
    "header header header"
    "sidebar main   widgets"
    "sidebar main   widgets";
  grid-template-columns: 250px 1fr 300px;
  grid-template-rows: 60px 1fr 1fr;
  gap: 20px;
  height: 100vh;
}

.header  { grid-area: header; }
.sidebar { grid-area: sidebar; }
.main    { grid-area: main; }
.widgets { grid-area: widgets; }
            

Header

Sidebar

Main Content

Widgets

Live Demo: Grid Dashboard

Common Misconceptions

❗ Misconception: "Grid replaces Flexbox"

Reality: Grid and Flexbox are complementary. Many layouts use both: Grid for the overall page structure and Flexbox for component-level layouts. For example, use Grid for your page layout but Flexbox for your navigation bar.

❗ Misconception: "Grid is always better"

Reality: For single-direction layouts, Flexbox is often simpler and more appropriate. Don't use Grid just because it's newer—use the right tool for the job.

❗ Misconception: "You must choose one or the other"

Reality: Combine them! Use Grid for your page layout, then use Flexbox inside Grid items for component layouts. They work beautifully together.

Performance Comparison

Both Flexbox and Grid are highly performant, but there are subtle differences:

Aspect	Flexbox	Grid
Initial Layout	Slightly faster for simple layouts	Slightly slower but negligible
Complex Layouts	Can require more DOM elements	Fewer elements needed
Dynamic Content	Adapts naturally to content changes	May need explicit sizing
Browser Support	Excellent (98%)	Excellent (96%)

Bottom line: Performance differences are minimal. Choose based on layout requirements, not performance concerns.

Combining Grid and Flexbox

The most powerful approach is using both together. Here's a real-world example of a card-based layout:

                /* Grid for the overall card layout */
.card-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(300px, 1fr));
  gap: 2rem;
}

/* Flexbox inside each card for content alignment */
.card {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  border: 1px solid #ccc;
  border-radius: 8px;
  overflow: hidden;
}

.card-content {
  flex: 1; /* Takes up available space */
  padding: 1.5rem;
}

.card-footer {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 1rem 1.5rem;
  background: #f5f5f5;
}
            

This pattern uses Grid to arrange cards responsively across the page, and Flexbox to arrange content within each card. This is a very common and effective pattern in modern web design.

Decision Checklist

Still not sure which to use? Ask yourself these questions:

1. Is your layout one-dimensional (single row or column)?

→ Use Flexbox

2. Do you need items to span multiple rows or columns?

→ Use Grid

3. Is the layout driven by the content size?

→ Use Flexbox

4. Do you need precise control over both dimensions?

→ Use Grid

5. Are you building a complete page layout?

→ Probably Grid (but consider both!)

Conclusion

There's no winner in the Grid vs Flexbox debate—they're both excellent tools with different strengths. The key is understanding when each is most appropriate:

Use Flexbox for one-dimensional, content-driven layouts
Use Grid for two-dimensional, layout-driven designs
Combine them for the best results

As you gain experience, the choice will become intuitive. Until then, experiment with both and see which feels more natural for your specific layout challenge.

Try Both Approaches Yourself

Experiment with Grid layouts using our interactive tool

Launch Gridlock Holmes →